“My feeling is real” first means that it is not pretended: the anger, fear or jealousy is genuinely occurring. It does not follow that the emotion’s assessment of the situation is correct. You may be angry because a friend has not replied, taking the silence as a slight, and later discover that the message was never delivered. The anger was not fake, but the offence at which it was directed did not exist.
In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle does not treat simply having or lacking emotion as the sole measure of virtue. He asks whether we feel at the right time, towards the right object and in the right way. Contemporary philosophy of emotion frames a related issue as fittingness. Fear typically presents its object as dangerous, while anger presents something as an offence; if the object lacks the relevant property, the emotion may be unfitting. Philosophers still disagree over whether emotions are fundamentally feelings, evaluations or motivations.
My view is that three questions should be kept apart: whether the emotion genuinely occurred, whether it fits the facts, and whether it supplies a reason for action. Acknowledging the first respects experience; examining the other two prevents feeling from becoming an automatic verdict on reality. This is not a demand to suppress emotion. A better response is to let it register, then ask what it noticed, what it missed, and whether blame or action based on it can still be justified.
https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.2.ii.html
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/
Discover more from Geoffrey Chen
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.