A credit-card statement has arrived. Reading it now could help someone adjust their spending, yet they swipe the notification away. The missing element is not access to information, but willingness to encounter it. Psychologists use “information avoidance” for deliberate efforts to prevent or delay receiving available but potentially unwelcome information.
What is avoided is not only bad news, but also the feelings and obligations that may follow. A statement may provoke anxiety, challenge the self-image “I manage money well”, and require cancelling a planned purchase. Not looking brings immediate relief, so a short-term emotional benefit can outweigh the information’s longer-term usefulness. This differs from simply forgetting or facing too much information: the avoidance is directed towards particular content.
Reviews identify anticipated threats to beliefs, emotion and unwanted action as common motives. Yet avoidance is not a fixed personality trait, and it is not always irrational. If information cannot change a decision and a person has no present capacity to deal with it, postponing exposure may be limited emotion regulation. The important question is whether the delay has a boundary. When the information could still alter action, repeatedly renewing “not now” may exchange present calm for fewer later choices. Studies span health, finance and politics, and their definitions and measures vary, so one label cannot explain every unopened notification.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17456916231197668
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021288
Discover more from Geoffrey Chen
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.