
A child who solves a difficult problem will naturally enjoy hearing, “You’re so smart.” Yet this praise explains one success as a stable personal quality. If the next problem ends in failure, what feels threatened may be not only the answer but also the identity: “Perhaps I’m not smart after all.” Protecting that label can make challenge avoidance more attractive, or shift attention from finding a better method to proving ability.
Across six experiments, Mueller and Dweck found that fifth-grade students praised for intelligence after completing problems adopted performance goals more often than those praised for effort. After difficult problems, they also showed less persistence and enjoyment, and weaker later performance. This provides causal evidence within controlled studies, but it does not show that every kind of praise has the same effect for every person or age group. A major review found that outcomes also depend on whether praise seems sincere or controlling, relies on social comparison, and communicates realistic standards. Research with adults has not simply reproduced the full pattern found in children.
The lesson is therefore neither “never praise” nor mechanically replacing every mention of intelligence with effort. More useful feedback points to an observable, adjustable process: “You tried a diagram, and that helped you see the relationship.” It recognises the result while showing what can be used again. These studies describe average tendencies; they do not diagnose any particular child’s motivation or personality.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9686450/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12206194/
Discover more from Geoffrey Chen
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.