In recent weeks, Australians have felt the pressure of rising fuel prices and medical costs very directly, and that feeling is not imaginary. On the fuel side, the immediate trigger was clearly the international conflict. On March 27, Reuters reported that Brent crude closed at US$112.57 a barrel, up 53 percent from before the escalation on February 27. But this was not a straight-line rise. On March 23, it had fallen to US$99.94 in a single day, which shows that global oil prices have not simply been climbing. They have been swinging violently at a high level. That is exactly why retail fuel prices in Australia have been pushed upward by global markets while also being amplified by panic, expectations, and pricing behavior at the local level.
So the recent public anger over petrol prices is not a denial that war pushes up costs. It is really asking a different question — how much of the increase reflects genuine cost pressure, and how much of it reflects businesses using the situation to widen margins. The ACCC made this point clearly on March 13. It said that between February 20 and March 11, retail petrol and diesel prices in many parts of Australia were rising just as fast as wholesale prices, and in some cases even faster. The government’s recent response has not simply been rhetorical. It has involved more frequent monitoring of the fuel market, direct pressure on retailers to explain pricing, and stronger penalties. Treasury announcements also show that legislation passed on March 26 increased penalties for misconduct related to fuel pricing. Of course, it would be too simplistic to say that any easing in prices must have been caused entirely by government action. But it is fair to say that stronger scrutiny and deterrence have helped reduce the room for opportunistic price inflation.
Still, if the analysis stops there, it remains too shallow. The deeper problem behind Australian fuel prices is not that Australia lacks resources or lacks energy. In fact, the opposite is true. Official data show that in 2023–24 Australia exported 15,292 PJ of energy and imported only 2,320 PJ. Of those exports, 66 percent were black coal and 30 percent were natural gas. Australia has never been a resource-poor or energy-poor country. The real problem is structural. While Australia is a major energy exporter, 99 percent of its imports in this area are crude oil and refined petroleum products, and in 2023–24 fully 79 percent of Australia’s refined fuel consumption was met by imports, which was the highest level on record. The government has also noted that domestic refineries themselves import close to two-thirds of the crude and feedstock they process. That fact alone shows where the real vulnerability lies. The issue is not whether Australia has resources. The issue is how those resources enter ordinary economic life, and in what form. More precisely, because of globalization and long historical inertia, Australia has relied on international supply chains for the production and delivery of refined fuels instead of building a sufficiently complete, flexible, and resilient domestic refining system of its own.
That point also needs to be stated carefully. Australia does still have domestic refining capacity. The issue is not total absence, but insufficiency. Official material shows that after two refineries closed in 2021, Australia was left with only two operating refineries, and both require government support to remain viable at least until 2027. So Australia has not completely lost its refining industry, but it no longer has a system strong enough, stable enough, or broad enough to count as real strategic resilience. That is why current government actions such as price monitoring, stock management, supply safeguards, and temporary intervention are necessary but still limited. They are measures of containment. The deeper strategic question is whether Australia is willing to rethink fuel security, storage, refining capacity, transport redundancy, and alternative energy pathways at a national level.
The electricity system reflects a similar structural problem. Australia is clearly moving toward energy transition and trying to reduce its long-term dependence on coal, but that transition cannot be completed by slogans. Official figures show that in 2024 fossil fuels still accounted for 64 percent of total electricity generation in Australia, with coal alone still providing 45 percent. That means coal is declining, but it remains a major pillar of the system. In other words, Australia is not dealing with an energy system that has already completed its transition. It is dealing with one in which the old structure is being phased down while the new structure is not yet strong enough to fully replace it. Such a system is especially vulnerable when external shocks arrive, because short-term prices, long-term security, environmental goals, and household affordability all collide at once, and the result is often unsatisfactory on every front.
So if we look beneath the fuel price issue, the real conclusion is not simply that the government has recently been tougher on opportunistic pricing. The more important point is that short-term intervention can only soften the shock. It cannot substitute for structural reform. What Australia really needs to face is not just how to contain this round of fuel price pressure, but how to avoid being this exposed again when the next external disruption arrives.
The same basic logic applies to healthcare. Over the past few years, Australians have clearly felt the decline of bulk billing. Operating costs for GPs have risen, government rebates have lagged behind, and many clinics have shifted toward mixed billing, leaving patients to pay more out of pocket. This process continued for so long that many people had come to see it as almost irreversible.
But in the past year, that trend has genuinely begun to reverse. Official data published in February 2026 show that there are now more than 3,400 Medicare Bulk Billing Practices across the country, and nearly 1,300 of them had previously been mixed billing clinics. The national GP bulk billing rate rose to 81.4 percent in just three months, one of the biggest quarterly increases in the past two decades. On this issue itself, the government’s recent package of incentives and rebate changes has clearly had visible effects. That should be acknowledged plainly.
But acknowledging short-term gains does not mean the deeper problem has been solved. Just like fuel, the visible issue in healthcare is price, but the deeper issue is structure. The government’s own language around Strengthening Medicare makes this very clear. The goal is not merely to inject more money into the system for a while. It is to change the way primary care is funded and delivered, moving toward a model that is more integrated, more patient-centered, and less fragmented. The Primary Health Care 10 Year Plan also identifies funding reform, integrated care, and locally delivered care as core priorities. At the same time, the government’s own GP supply and demand studies show that over the next 25 years the number of GPs is still unlikely to keep up with community needs. This means the rebound in bulk billing matters, but it is only an entry point. The real structural questions lie deeper — doctor supply, geographic distribution, payment models, chronic disease management, team-based care, and the efficiency of primary care overall. If those things are not fixed, subsidies will eventually hit their limit.
That is why healthcare reform cannot stop at the point of saying that the government should simply spend more. Official figures show that around 2,100 doctors are expected to begin GP training in 2026, which does suggest that the government understands the need to strengthen the workforce. But at the same time, the broader structural pressures in disability support and public health spending show that the problem has never been only about whether enough money is being allocated. The 2025–26 budget set aside A$175.4 million to strengthen the integrity and sustainability of the NDIS, and the March 2025 quarterly report showed that annual NDIS cost growth had already slowed to 10.6 percent, with a target of reducing it to 8 percent by July 1, 2026. That shows the government itself recognizes that subsidies and expansion alone cannot replace rule repair, better auditing, clearer boundaries in payment systems, and stronger institutional discipline. If Australia wants a healthcare system that is healthier and stronger, it will ultimately need structural adjustment, not endless fiscal patching over each exposed weakness.
If we place fuel prices and bulk billing side by side, the meaning becomes quite clear. In these two areas that directly affect everyday life, the Labor government has recently shown a certain degree of policy force, and visible short-term effects have appeared. That should not be denied, and it should not be obscured for partisan reasons. But it must also be said that short-term effectiveness is not the same thing as a long-term answer. The deeper issue behind fuel prices is Australia’s structural vulnerability as a resource-rich country that still relies heavily on external supply chains for refined fuel. The deeper issue behind healthcare is the long-building imbalance between primary care funding, doctor supply, and the sustainability of the broader welfare system. Mature government is not just about pressing down visible problems in a crisis. It is about using those moments, when cracks become impossible to ignore, to force deeper reconstruction underneath. That deeper reconstruction is what matters next.
One final clarification is necessary. This article is only a discussion of two specific issues — fuel prices and healthcare. It is not an overall judgment on the Labor government’s total performance, and it is not a full evaluation of the Coalition, the Liberal Party, or the National Party either. It is simply a limited comment, based on recent verifiable facts, on where policy in these two areas has produced visible results and where the deeper structural problems remain unresolved.
Discover more from Geoffrey Chen
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.