Modern orchestras still use two kinds of double-bass bow. A French bow has a smaller frog and is held from above, in a manner related to violin and cello technique. A German bow has a taller, broader frog and is supported with the palm turned upwards. These are not merely two casual grips on the same tool: each bow is built to work with a different organisation of the hand and arm.
Their coexistence also reflects the bass's mixed history. Unlike the violin family, the double bass never settled into one completely uniform design. The German bow's underhand tradition is related to older viol technique, while the French bow is closer to other modern orchestral strings. The primary difference is how the body transfers arm weight, speed and direction into the bow hair. It does not mean that one bow is inherently powerful and the other inherently delicate. Skilled players can produce a clear attack, a sustained line and agile short notes with either.
When listening to a long bass note, notice whether it begins with a defined core and then continues steadily. The result depends on how the hair grips the thick string, where the bow meets it, and how speed and weight are balanced. A bow hold offers a path for movement; it does not make the musical judgement in advance. The survival of both traditions shows that technique need not converge on a single posture. If a movement reliably shapes sound, it has earned its place.
https://www.yamaha.com/en/musical_instrument_guide/violin/structure/structure006.html