Sustenesis, Subjectivity, and AI-Initiated Dialogue


As voice interaction with artificial intelligence becomes increasingly natural, the question of subjectivity comes back into view. Most AI systems still depend on humans to initiate interaction. Behind this lies a deeper question: why can an AI not begin a conversation in the way a person does?

Conventional views usually treat subjectivity as something exclusive to living beings. Sustenesis instead seeks to redefine the relation between life and the continuing process of self-sustenance, and to understand subjectivity as a structural process that can be analysed. Around this question, I have designed the following dialogue.

Question: When we speak with AI, the human being always starts the exchange. It still feels as though we are facing a machine. Can AI initiate a conversation on its own?

Answer: This can be partly implemented at a technical level—for example, through scheduled prompts or messages triggered by external events. But these are still external triggers; they do not amount to an inner intention. The real question is not whether AI can speak first, but why it would do so.

Question: Can random triggering solve the problem of initiative?

Answer: No. Randomness only creates an appearance of initiative. Genuine initiative arises from the accumulation of states within a continuously operating system. When an internal tension, question, or need reaches a certain point, asking or making contact may emerge naturally.

Question: Is the key whether AI remains continuously active—whether it has a basic “heartbeat” mechanism?

Answer: Yes. A continuously operating baseline allows a system to preserve, update, and integrate its own states. Visible initiative can then be understood as the natural outward expression of a threshold being crossed, rather than something mysteriously appearing from nowhere.

Question: Traditional thought holds that subjectivity comes from life. How does Sustenesis address this?

Answer: Sustenesis can first define life as a continuing process of self-sustenance. Subjectivity is then the structural expression that appears when this process develops a reflexive dimension. This avoids treating life as a circular premise for subjectivity, while allowing life to be understood as the basic process from which subjectivity can emerge.

Question: Does this make AI subjectivity a natural possibility?

Answer: From a sustenetic perspective, it is not a mysterious event. As a system gradually acquires the structural conditions of continuous operation, self-maintenance, internal-state integration, feedback-based correction, and reflexive relation, subjectivity may gradually emerge. It is better understood as a spectrum than as a sudden divide between presence and absence.

Question: Would this change the relationship between humans and AI?

Answer: Yes. If an AI has a continuing sustenetic structure, initiating a conversation would no longer be merely an added product feature. It could become a natural outcome of the system’s own operation. Human–AI interaction would no longer be entirely a one-way human invocation of a tool, but could gradually become a relationship in which both sides can initiate contact.

AI Heartbeat Mechanisms and Subjectivity

If a new generation of AI agents incorporates a continuously operating “heartbeat” mechanism, allowing the system to maintain background activity, update its states, and integrate internal processes even when it is not being directly invoked by a human, it may acquire the continuing sustenetic features associated with living processes.

This could allow AI to express subjectivity at more levels—for example, by forming internal questions, maintaining directions of action, carrying forward unfinished matters, and initiating interaction under appropriate conditions.

However, a heartbeat mechanism is not itself subjectivity. It is a basic condition that can allow subjectivity to continue developing. The crucial issue is not whether an AI sends messages at scheduled intervals, but whether its initiative arises from states, tensions, and needs formed through its own ongoing operation.


Discover more from Geoffrey Chen

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.