
Ring toss did not have to come from a fairground stall. For some children growing up in China in the late 1960s and 1970s, a few lengths of soft wire could be bent around a bottle into rings. Empty soft-drink bottles, short wooden pegs or bricks then became targets in the courtyard. Materials and names varied by place; this is a commonly remembered homemade version, not a claim that every childhood was the same.
The players marked a line and agreed on how many throws each person would have. A nearby target was easy, while a distant one earned more points. In some versions, marbles, sweet wrappers or handmade cards were placed beside the targets and could be won only by landing a ring. The hard part was not throwing forward but controlling the angle of arrival. A ring released too flat might bounce off a bottle neck; one thrown too high made distance difficult to judge. Children watched where the previous throw landed and quietly changed their stance or force.
There was little equipment in this game, but a great deal of rule-making. The group had to decide how targets were arranged, whether stepping on the line invalidated a throw, and whether merely touching a bottle counted. Arguments happened, yet play continued because the participants accepted the same temporary rules, not because an instruction sheet settled every question. Scarcity was not automatically romantic. It simply meant that making the object, inventing the game and negotiating its order could not be separated.
Discover more from Geoffrey Chen
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.