The Hard Problem of Consciousness Is Not a Problem of Consciousness Itself

Sustenesis Theory reframes the hard problem of consciousness, arguing that the difficulty arises from traditional philosophy’s isolation of the subject. Instead of viewing consciousness as an internal mystery, it is seen as reflexive integration within living systems, where experiences are formed through the interaction of internal states and external environments.

Does AI Have Consciousness? A Simple Explanation from Sustenesis Theory

The debate over whether AI has consciousness revolves around the unclear definition of consciousness itself. While AI exhibits consciousness-like characteristics, it lacks the subjective experience and essential elements of human consciousness, such as emotions and survival pressure. Sustenesis Theory redefines consciousness, highlighting its structural nature rather than viewing it as an isolated entity.

Existence Is Not the Manifestation of Essence, but the Maintenance of Structure

Sustenesis Theory proposes that existence is defined by the maintenance of structure rather than the presence of a fixed essence. It emphasizes that a thing forms its identity through ongoing organization, constraints, and structural stability, rather than through static characteristics. This perspective reshapes philosophical inquiries into existence, knowledge, and organization.

A Sustenesis Critique of Hegel’s Dialectic

This essay critiques Hegel’s dialectic, highlighting the issue of shifting judgment standards. While Hegel’s dialectic recognizes change and contradiction, it risks misinterpreting failures as development. Sustenesis Theory addresses this by focusing on how structures maintain integrity through change, emphasizing the need for stability amidst fluidity in philosophical thought.

The Church as a Structure of Meaning

This essay explores the church as a structure defined by difference, constraint, and sustainment. It illustrates how churches create and maintain identity through doctrines, rituals, and practices while emphasizing the necessity of adapting to societal changes. The analysis highlights the balance between preserving identity and remaining open to correction and reflection.

理性、直觉与AI时代的主体性问题

理性与非理性的关系远非简单对立,它们各有适用范围,而非简单地反驳对方。在AI时代,我们需重新审视主体性,理性与直觉的互动如何影响决策与智能系统的发展。